Sharma's argument is that the honest document this year is the Economic Survey, not the Budget speech — and it reads unusually bleak for a country growing at 8%. It guides growth down to 6.5–7%, notes that GVA is running nearer 6% because tax collections are doing some of the lifting, and warns that the geopolitical window China walked through between 1980 and 2015 will not reopen for India's march to Viksit Bharat 2047. Headline inflation of 3–3.4% conceals food inflation close to 10%, driven by erratic monsoons hitting vegetables and pulses, and food inflation is an inequality tax: it never touches the well-paid and takes the whole margin from everyone else. Then the Survey turns on the private sector. Across roughly 33,000 sampled companies, profits have about quadrupled in three years since the 2019 corporate tax cut, while hiring and compensation hardly kept up and real wage growth went negative for part of FY24 — so Delhi proposes a compact between centre, states and companies, and asks corporates to think about how AI augments labour rather than displaces it. Sharma's retort is blunt: if you want the money back, raise the tax rate instead of inventing a revenue share on top of one. The Budget itself pays for jobs directly — ₹15,000 in direct transfers to first-time formal-sector workers, ₹3,000 a month to employers per additional hire, ₹5,000-a-month internship stipends part-funded from CSR — and abolishes angel tax outright. The sting sits at the end: the buyback tax has moved from the company to the shareholder, and it now applies to the entire amount received, not the gain.
Worth your time if you are
Startup investors planning a cap-table restructuring
Founders reading a Budget without a CA on call
Anyone about to register a land or property sale
HR and finance heads sizing up the employment-linked incentives
Salaried filers deciding between the old and new regimes