The founders' claim is that a coding agent is an extraordinarily intelligent generalist with amnesia — dazzling on a proof of concept, lost inside a ten-million-line enterprise code base it must re-read every morning, where every re-read burns tokens and every token costs dollars. Vinay's answer is not another agent but a layer beneath them: latent graphs that mine a legacy code base for its explicit and implicit connections, write documentation on top, and hand Claude Code, Codex or whatever ships next the context a twenty-five-year architect already carries in his head. Without it, he says, the agent invents its own database and its own microservices; with it, the agent fits into the ecosystem it found. Arvind puts numbers on that — 2x the accuracy of any rival context layer once plugged in, a tenth the cost to create and maintain the graph — and then makes the larger bet: code is becoming ephemeral, the accumulated knowledge is the real IP, and the store of that knowledge should be worth five to ten times whatever GitHub is today. Pradosh, who ran one of the country's only dedicated deep-learning labs at IIT Delhi when his two co-founders were master's students hunting for a thesis, supplies the discipline — take one sub-problem, be the best in the world at it, and if a competitor beats you, take another. He is also blunt about the constraint: in San Francisco they would have raised far more, and nobody in India has yet built a foundation model and learned the engineering tricks that never get written down. The stakes are on record — about $3 million of run rate by year end, $20–25 million in two years.
Worth your time if you are
CTOs staring at a ten-million-line legacy monolith
Developers who re-explain the same code base to an agent every morning
Professor-founders wondering whether a lab can become a company
Deep-tech investors sizing India's AI tooling bets