Sauvage's claim is that deep tech means atoms, not bits — innovation down at the material-science level, with hardware and software as two sides of one coin — and that it only earns its keep when it becomes profitable, because unprofitable technology cannot scale. From that first principle follows the contrarian move: back what is not yet obvious, roughly two years early, before consensus prices it in. AutoFlight went in during 2020 when air taxis sounded like science fiction; Ascend Elements was ten people; AM Batteries was two part-time professors. The sharper argument is about geopolitics. The fund deliberately models both a frictionless world and a fragmenting one, and Sauvage's conclusion is that friction acts as a subsidy: when rare materials get stuck behind tariffs, Challenger technologies — sodium-ion storage, copper and platinum-group recycling, green hydrogen, eventually nuclear fusion — finally get an opening against cheap incumbents. India sits in the middle of that. Its engineering brand power now stays home instead of emigrating, its temperature range makes sodium-ion interesting, and the global South's catch-up, which he concedes is unfair, is precisely where a profitable green technology could make India a powerhouse. What is missing is the exit — the hard-tech success story that would trigger the snowball SaaS already got. Three India investments in, an 88-year-old cassette company's venture arm is betting it arrives.
Worth your time if you are
Scientists sitting on a technology that isn't profitable yet
Deep-tech founders choosing between a grant and a term sheet
Climate and energy investors mapping post-lithium storage
Corporate strategy teams weighing an India venture arm